|A TOKEN-BASED SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF MCTAGGART’S PARADOX|
|Written by CHENG-CHIH TSAI|
ABSTRACT. In his famous argument for the unreality of time, McTaggart claims that i) being past, being present, and being future are incompatible properties of an event, yet ii) every event admits all these three properties. In this paper, I examine two key concepts involved in the formulation of i) and ii), namely that of “validity” and that of “contradiction”, and for each concept I distinguish a static version and a dynamic version of it. I then arrive at three different ways of formulating McTaggart’s claims that avoid the notorious McTaggart’s Paradox. So long as we demand that McTaggart make clear use/mention and token/type distinctions in his claims, we shall find that it is indeed very difficult for him to get a genuine contradiction from i) and ii). pp. 107–124
Keywords: McTaggart’s Paradox, Incompatibility Thesis, All-inclusive Thesis, static contradiction, dynamic contradiction
Notice to readers
In order to view full text of this article, you must be a paid Addleton journals subscriber or purchase electronic access to this article. You may also purchase a print copy of this article.