|POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF THEATRE: THE EXPERIENCE OF AVANT-GARDE AND BLACK THEATRE|
|Written by MICHAEL A. PETERS, RUTH NICOLE BROWN|
ABSTRACT. In this paper we argue there are three separate senses of the political in theatre – what we call in turn: (1) revolutionary content, a theatre that much in the style of Brecht or Lukacs seeks to represent the truth of class, gender or “race” relations; (2) experimental theatre, theatre that experiments with inventing new rules in the game and sometimes a new game; (3) metatheatricality – the vehicle whereby a play comments on itself, drawing attention to the circumstances of its own production, such as the presence of the audience or the fact that the actors are actors, and/or the making explicit of the literary artifice behind the production. In the first section we trace the relation between theatre and the European avant-garde beginning with the problem of realism in socialist art; in the second section we trace the development and preoccupations of Black theatre and its relation to political philosophy of theatre; and in the third and final section, we make some observations about the concept of metatheatricality. (pp. 17–35)
Keywords: political, philosophy, avant-garde, black, theatre, poetry
Notice to readers
In order to view full text of this article, you must be a paid Addleton journals subscriber or purchase electronic access to this article. You may also purchase a print copy of this article.